Prof. Tania A Baker

Whitehead Professor of Biology
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) Investigator

Primary DLC

Department of Biology

MIT Room: 68-523

Assistant

Gina Lee
ginalee@mit.edu

Areas of Interest and Expertise

Mechanism of Transpositional Recombination Studied with the Use of the Bacteriophage Mu System and Biochemical and Molecular Biological Approaches
Biochemistry and Biophysics
Immunology
Microbiology
Structural Biology
Virology

Research Summary

Protein-Catalyzed Protein Remodeling -- Cells need to be able to unfold stable proteins to take apart protein complexes and aggregates, to transport proteins between cellular compartments and to degrade unstable or damaged proteins. Members of the Clp/Hsp100 protein family (a AAA+ ATPase subfamily) are powerful protein-unfolding enzymes. Clp/Hsp100 proteins are present in bacteria, plants, and animals. We initially identified the E.coli ClpX protein based on its ability to destabilize an exceedingly stable protein-DNA complex. ClpX also forms a complex with a peptidase complex known as ClpP to generate the ClpXP ATP-dependent protease.

Using model protein substrates we demonstrated that Clp/Hsp100 enzymes have the capacity to completely unfold their substrate proteins. This unfolding reaction is essential for Clp-mediated protein degradation, as the entry pore to the ClpP protease chamber is ~10Å, and therefore too small to allow passage of anything other than an unfolded polypeptide. Some of our current studies are focused on understanding the mechanism of protein unfolding, and elucidating how the protein processing reactions that result in complete unfolding for proteolysis, differ from those that are involved in destabilizing protein complexes.

We are also very interested in the strategies used by Clp/Hsp100 proteins to recognize proteins as substrates and in how this recognition is regulated. We recently completed a large-scale proteomic screen for new cellular substrates for ClpXP. This analysis identified about 60 new substrate proteins. These proteins included transcription factors, metabolic enzymes and proteins involved in the starvation and oxidative stress responses. An additional 30 proteins were identified in cells experiencing DNA damage. This analysis reveals that ClpXP plays a large role in resculpting the bacterial proteome, essentially as cells cope with changing environmental conditions.

Substrate proteins carry specific peptide sequences in exposed regions, often near either the N- or C-terminus of the protein, that are used as substrate-recognition tags. For ClpX, we have identified and characterized five classes of these recognition motifs. These peptide sequences can be recognized directly by the Clp/Hsp100 enzyme, or recognition can be further controlled by the action of additional proteins that serve as delivery factors. One such factor is the E. coli SspB protein. We have recently solved the structure of this protein with its bound peptide. This analysis, coupled with biochemical experiments, has provided insight into the mechanism used to regulate protein-recognition within the cell.

DNA Transposition: Transposable elements appear to have successfully invaded all forms of life, promoting their movement from one DNA site to another by a type of genetic recombination called transposition. The impact of transposition on genome stability and human health is immense. Many transposable elements can insert into essentially any DNA sequence and are thus a common source of mutations and genome rearrangements. The rapid spread of antibiotic resistance genes is largely a result of transposable elements moving throughout bacterial populations. Furthermore, retroviruses, including HIV, integrate into the host chromosome via a mechanism nearly identical to transposition. Although transposition of most elements is rare, the bacterial virus Mu can achieve 100 rounds of transposition in one hour; thus Mu transposition is well suited for mechanistic analysis.

Transposition of many elements occurs using a common set of DNA cleavage and joining reactions. This similarity in the mechanism is reflected in the proteins that catalyze the reactions. Structural and functional studies of the Mu transposase have contributed to the understanding of this important protein family. We have found and characterized regions of Mu transposase that are homologous to regions in other transposases and retroviral integrases. Structural studies of the central domain of Mu transposase and two retroviral integrases confirmed this relationship by demonstrating that the core domains of these proteins have a nearly identical fold. Analysis of the arrangement of subunits in the active tetramer of the Mu transposase also has provided mechanistic insight into how pairing of DNA molecules is coupled to catalysis of recombination.

Transposons are among the simplest genetic entities, yet they often exhibit sophisticated means of interacting with their host cells and responding to changing cellular environments. Illuminating the regulation of transposition is intricately intertwined with understanding the mechanism. Mu transposition is subject to at least two types of control: (1) regulation of DNA target site choice; and (2) control of the choice between using a non-replicative or a replicative transposition mechanism. In each of the examples of regulation of the Mu transposition pathway, the process is either known or proposed to involve direct protein-protein contacts between the transpososome and other proteins. We are currently focusing on defining interactions between Mu transposase and its regulatory proteins, and probing how these interactions provide precision and flexibility to the recombination mechanism.

Recent Work