The bad guys are relentless, armed with cutting-edge GenAI, trickier phishing schemes, and new attack vectors. Brace yourself for a wild ride where traditional protection takes a backseat, and cyber resilience steals the spotlight. No more waiting for breaches to happen – it’s time to take charge. From the desk jockeys to the big shots, everyone must be on the cyber resilience squad. Don’t just survive, use this opportunity to thrive in the chaos of cyber threats because, in this digital jungle, resilience isn’t an option; it’s the only way to play the game.
U.S. manufacturing is at a transformational moment as the country embarks on an ambitious agenda to rebuild its industrial base. Supply chain priorities, climate threats, a changing geopolitical landscape, technological advances, and a new trajectory in public policy are leading to breakthrough innovations and significant investments in domestic manufacturing. Across core industries – transportation, semiconductors, defense, energy, and materials– there is a generational shift in U.S. manufacturing toward greater resilience, digitalization, and sustainability. Liz Reynolds will provide an overview of the recent changes that are impacting the U.S. industrial base and the implications for U.S. manufacturing going forward.
Decarbonizing hard-to-abate sectors is critical to achieve climate change goals given the unique and often fossil fuel-based manufacturing processes. For developed and emerging economies, evaluating power and heavy industry sectors are pertinent given the immense growth expected in the upcoming decades. This presentation will focus on cost and emission models that have been developed and evaluated using the Sesame platform. Specifically, case studies for Hydrogen, Iron and Steel, and Power will be presented demonstrating the impact of technology options, supply chain choices and regional differences. In addition to the plant-level analysis, a system view will be taken to estimate emissions and energy consumption for the entire fleet. By comparing the various technology routes on a cost and emission basis, potential decarbonization strategies, marginal abatement cost, and sensitivities to fuel and other operational costs will be analyzed. The sectoral analysis indicates the immense increase in energy consumption and corresponding infrastructure support for industrial decarbonization. A combination of resource efficiency and technology improvements will be important for reducing emissions from a business-as-usual operation. Overall, the analysis indicates the role of system analysis in evaluating plant-level and system level changes in legacy sectors that are expanding and will be transitioning from traditional production methods. This study is timely as the global community sets climate goals and must consider hard-to-abate sectors, during the energy transition. Using system analysis provides insight to future plant-level and sectoral-level emission and cost challenges.
Achieving long-term climate stabilization targets that limit warming to 1.5oC or 2oC requires deep decarbonization, with total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions eventually falling to net zero. Because some emissions in the economy are difficult to eliminate, most 1.5oC or 2oC pathways rely on negative emissions strategies to offset residual positive GHG emissions in hard-to-abate sectors. Among carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) and natural-climate solutions such as afforestation and reforestation (A/R) are among the most widely considered options. The deployment of these options will depend on their availability as well as the climate policy regime, particularly the availability of international emissions trading. In fact, CDR and international trade in GHG permits mutually reinforce each other. This relationship and its implications for the scale of CDR and emissions trading, regional deployment, carbon prices, and GDP will be discussed in this talk.