
Prof. Tomaso Poggio
Director, Center for Biological and Computational Learning (CBCL)
Director, MIT Intelligence Initiative
Primary DLC
Areas of Interest and Expertise
Neuroscience
Machine and Human Vision
Finance
Nonlinear System Theory
Computation
E-Business
Theory of Learning
Object Detection/Recognition
Virtual Financial Markets
Systems and Computational Neuroscience
Research Summary
-
Projects
January 26, 2016Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences
Invariance and Selectivity in Representation Learning
Principal Investigator Tomaso Poggio
January 26, 2016Department of Brain and Cognitive SciencesInvariant Representation Learning for Speech Recognition
Principal Investigator Tomaso Poggio
January 26, 2016Department of Brain and Cognitive SciencesLearning and Reasoning in Symbolic Domains
Principal Investigator Tomaso Poggio
January 26, 2016Department of Brain and Cognitive SciencesInvariant Representations for Action Recognition in the Human Visual System
Principal Investigator Tomaso Poggio
January 26, 2016Department of Brain and Cognitive SciencesVisual Processing with Minimal Recognizable Configurations
Principal Investigator Tomaso Poggio
September 9, 2013Department of Brain and Cognitive SciencesCenter for Brains, Minds and Machines (CBMM)
Principal Investigators Tomaso Poggio , James DiCarlo
May 7, 2013Department of Brain and Cognitive SciencesLaboratory for Computational and Statistical Learning (LCSL)
Principal Investigator Tomaso Poggio
October 29, 2010Department of Brain and Cognitive SciencesMIT Intelligence Initiative (I2@MIT)
Principal Investigator Tomaso Poggio
June 22, 2006Department of Brain and Cognitive SciencesPerception Research
Principal Investigator Tomaso Poggio
-
Books
Publication date: August 19, 2016Books
Visual Cortex and Deep Networks: Learning Invariant Representations
-
Video
Tomaso Poggio - 2016 Japan
The Problem of Intelligence: Today’s Science, Tomorrows Engineering
The birth of artificial-intelligence research as an autonomous discipline is generally thought to have been the month long Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence in 1956, which convened 10 leading electrical engineers — including MIT’s Marvin Minsky and Claude Shannon — to discuss “how to make machines use language” and “form abstractions and concepts.” A decade later, impressed by rapid advances in the design of digital computers, Minsky was emboldened to declare that “within a generation ... the problem of creating ‘artificial intelligence’ will substantially be solved.”
The problem, of course, turned out to be much more difficult than AI’s pioneers had imagined. In recent years, by exploiting machine learning — in which computers learn to perform tasks from sets of training examples — artificial-intelligence researchers have built special-purpose systems that can do things like interpret spoken language or play Atari games or drive cars using vision with great success.
But according to Tomaso Poggio, the Eugene McDermott Professor of Brain Sciences and Human Behavior at MIT, “These recent achievements have, ironically, underscored the limitations of computer science and artificial intelligence. We do not yet understand how the brain gives rise to intelligence, nor do we know how to build machines that are as broadly intelligent as we are.”
Poggio thinks that AI research needs to revive its early ambitions. “It’s time to try again,” he says. “We know much more than we did before about biological brains and how they produce intelligent behavior. We’re now at the point where we can start applying that understanding from neuroscience, cognitive science and computer science to the design of intelligent machines.”