Where Industry Meets Innovation

  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Credits
  • sign in Sign In
February 1, 2015Night pic of MIT dome.

Resources

Browse News

  • View All
  • ILP News
  • MIT Research News
  • MIT Sloan Management Review
  • Technology Review

ILP Institute Insider

January 19, 2015
ILP Feature Story Banner

Better Machine Learning

When Kalyan Veeramachaneni joined the Any Scale Learning For All (ALFA) group at MIT’s CSAIL as a postdoc in 2010, he worked on large-scale machine learning platforms that enable the construction of models from huge data sets. “The question then was how to decompose a learning algorithm and data into pieces, so each piece could be locally loaded into different machines and several models could be learnt independently,” says Veeramachaneni, currently a research scientist at ALFA.
Kalyan Veeramachaneni
Research Scientists
ALFA Group, MIT CSAIL
“We then had to decompose the learning algorithm so we could parallelize the compute on each node,” says Veeramachaneni. “In this way, the data on each node could be learned by the system, and then we could combine all the solutions and models that had been independently learned.”

By 2013, once ALFA had built multiple platforms to accomplish these goals, the team started on a new problem: the growing bottleneck caused by the process of translating the raw data into the formats required by most machine learning systems.

“Most machine learning systems usually require a covariates table in a column-wise format, as well as a response variable that we try to predict,” says Veeramachaneni. “The process to get these from raw data involves curation, syncing and linking of data, and even generating ideas for variables that we can then operationalize and form.”

Much of Veeramachaneni’s recent research has focused on how to automate this lengthy data prep process. “Data scientists go to all these boot camps in Silicon Valley to learn open source Big Data software like Hadoop, and they come back, and say ‘Great, but we’re still stuck with the problem of getting the raw data to a place where we can use all these tools,’” says Veeramachaneni.

Veeramachaneni and his team are also exploring how to efficiently integrate the expertise of domain experts, “so it won’t take up too much of their time,” he says. “Our biggest challenge is how to use human input efficiently, and how to make the interactions seamless and efficient. What sort of collaborative frameworks and mechanisms can we build too increase the pool of people who participate?”

GigaBeats and BeatDB
One project in which Veeramachaneni tested his automated data prep concepts was ALFA’s GigaBeats project. GigaBeats analyzes arterial blood pressure signals from thousands of patients to predict a future condition. With GigaBeats, numerous steps are involved to prepare the data for analysis, says Veeramachaneni. These include cleaning and conditioning, low pass filters, and extracting features by applying signal-level transformations.

Many of these steps involve human decision-making. Often, domain experts know how to do it, but sometimes it’s up to the computer scientist. In either case, there’s no easy way to go back and revisit those human interventions when a choice made later in the pipeline does not result in the expected level of predictive accuracy, says Veeramachaneni.

Recently, ALFA has built some novel platforms that automate the process, shrinking the prep time from months to a few days. To automate and accelerate data translation, while also enabling visibility into earlier decision-making, ALFA has developed a “complete solution” called BeatDB.

“With BeatDB, we have tunable parameters that in some cases can be input by domain experts, and the rest are automatically tuned,” says Veeramachaneni. “From this, we can learn how decisions made at the low-level, raw representation stage can impact the final predicted accuracy efficacy. This deep mining solution combines all layers of machine learning into a single pipeline and then optimizes and tunes with other machine learning algorithms on top of it. It really enables fast discovery.”

Now that ALFA has made progress on integrating and recording human input, the group is also looking for better ways to present the processed data. For example, when showing GigaBeats data to medical professionals, “they are often much more comfortable if a better representation is given to them instead of showing them raw data,” says Veeramachaneni. “It makes it easier to provide input. A lot of our focus is on improving the presentation so we can more easily pull their input into our algorithms, clean or fix the data, or create variables.”

A Crowdsourcing Solution
While automating ALFA’s machine learning pipelines, Veeramachaneni has also contributed to a number of real-world analytics projects. Recently, he has been analyzing raw click data from MOOCs (massive open online courses) with the hopes of improving courseware. The initial project is to determine stop-out (drop-out) rates based on online click behavior.

“The online learning platforms record data coming from the interaction of hundreds of thousands of learners,” says Veeramachaneni. “We are now able to identify variables that can predict stop-out on a single course. The next stage is to reveal the variables of stop-out and show how to improve the course design.”

The first challenge in the MOOC project was to organize the data. There are multiple data streams in addition to clickstream data, and they are usually spread over multiple databases and stored in multiple formats. Veeramachaneni has standardized these sources, integrating them into a single database called MOOCdb “In this way, software written on top of the database can be re-used,” says Veeramachaneni.

The next challenge is to decide what variables to look at. ALFA has explored all sorts of theories about MOOC behavior. For example, if a student is studying early in the morning, he or she is more likely to stay in the course. Another theory is based on dividing the time spent on the course by how many problems a student gets right. But, Veeramachaneni says, “If I’m trying to predict stop-out, there’s no algorithm that automatically comes up with the behavioral variables that influence it. The biggest challenge is that the variables are defined by humans, which creates a big bottleneck.”

They turned to crowdsourcing “to tap into as many people as we can,” says Veeramachaneni. “We have built a crowdsourcing platform where people can submit an idea against problems such as stop-out,” says Veeramachaneni. “Another set of people can operationalize that, such as writing a script to extract that variable on a per student basis.”

This research could apply to a number of domains where analysts are trying to predict human behavior based on captured data, such as fraud detection, says Veeramachaneni. Banks and other companies are increasingly analyzing their transaction databases to try to determine whether the person doing the transaction is authentic.

“One variable would be how far the transaction happened from the person’s home, or how the amount compares to the total that was spent by the person over the last year,” says Veeramachaneni. “Coming up with these ideas is based on very relatable data with which we can all identify. So crowdsourcing could be helpful here, too.”

Research News

January 12, 2015

Vision system for household robots

For household robots ever to be practical, they’ll need to be able to recognize the objects they’re supposed to manipulate. But while object recognition is one of the most widely studied topics in artificial intelligence, even the best object detectors still fail much of the time.

Researchers at MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory believe that household robots should take advantage of their mobility and their relatively static environments to make object recognition easier, by imaging objects from multiple perspectives before making judgments about their identity. Matching up the objects depicted in the different images, however, poses its own computational challenges.

In a paper appearing in a forthcoming issue of the International Journal of Robotics Research, the MIT researchers show that a system using an off-the-shelf algorithm to aggregate different perspectives can recognize four times as many objects as one that uses a single perspective, while reducing the number of misidentifications.

MIT Sloan
Management Review

January 8, 2015

How Can Your Board Best Help Your Company?

A company’s board of directors can take on a variety of different roles, and the right one will depend in part on factors such as a company’s culture and the home country’s legal requirements.

In thinking about how a board can help, a company should also first start by thinking about what it means when it uses the word strategy. “This might sound pedantic, but a shared understanding of how the company defines its strategic issues is actually of great practical importance,” write Didier Cossin and Estelle Metayer. “Strategy means many different things to different people, and lack of clarity about what it means can prevent management from taking full advantage of competitive opportunities.”

In “How Strategic Is Your Board?” in the Fall 2014 issue of MIT Sloan Management Review, Cossin and Metayer note that there are five ways of looking at strategy:

1. Strategy as planning
2. Strategy as a redrawing of competitive boundaries
3. Strategy as a focused response to a key challenge
4. Strategy as the development of core competencies
5. Strategy as optimizing the value created for stakeholders


A company that’s clear about what kind of strategy it’s looking for can ask a board to help in specific ways. Board typically play up to three roles, Cossin and Metayer say:

A. The board can be a supervisor, spending most of its time monitoring overall corporate performance and the behavior of the executive team.
B. The board can be a cocreator, providing big picture industry and managerial vision.
C. The board can be a supporter, lending its credibility and authority both to the company’s leaders and to the outside world.

Cossin and Metayer’s article includes a chart that presents the two lists above as x and y axes. Depending what a company’s approach to strategy is and what kind of role it wishes a board to play, Cossin and Metayer suggest specific ways that a board can add value.

For instance, if a company thinks of strategy as planning (#1, above), and if it wants the board to take a supervisory role (A, above), then Cossin and Metayer recommend that the board have a strong supervisory skill set and focus on review key performance indicators and providing regular evaluation.

On the other hand, if a company thinks of strategy as a redrawing of competitive boundaries (#2) and wants the board to be a cocreator of ideas (B), then the board should possess diverse frames of reference and help executives identify strategic blind spots, go through scenario planning, and conduct an industry convergence analysis.

For more about boards and strategy, including a look at the full chart and Cossin and Metayer’s thoughts about when a board’s role should change, read the full article.


This article draws from In “How Strategic Is Your Board?” by Didier Cossin (IMD) and Estelle Metayer (Competia and McGill University), which appeared in the Fall 2014 issue of MIT Sloan Management Review.